David Hume Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

David Hume - Essay Example David argues that experience can never lead to knowledge. He asserts that some vital beliefs about our world can never be justified either by experience or by reason. For Hume, people assume that experience tells them something regarding the world because of the habit or custom that human nature forces them to take seriously. However, he believed that humans do have knowledge only of the things they directly experience. Hume reveals that experience never tell us much. Considering event A and B, we assert that A causes B whenever the two occur together, implying they are constantly conjoined. Whenever we obtain A, we also obtain B, and we are certain that this conjunction will carry on. Once people realize that â€Å"A should bring about B† is equivalent simply to â€Å"Due to their stable conjunction, people are psychologically sure that B will go after A†, then they are left with an extremely weak idea of necessity. This weak grasp on the causal efficacy assists give rise to problem of Induction; people are not logically justified in drawing any inductive inference regarding the world. Amid Hume scholars it`s a subject of debate how sincerely Hume wants us to take up this conclusion and also whether causation comprises wholly in constant conjunction. Another theory of David’s influential causal arguments is the problem of induction. This is a skeptical argument which utilizes David’s insights regarding experience limiting individuals` causal knowledge to the constant conjunction (Cahalan 52). Though David offers a quick version of this principle in the center of his discussion of the causation in Treatise (T 1.3.6), it`s illustrated out more clearly inside Section IV of Enquiry. A prominent argument, its skeptical conclusions have caused a drastic effect on the epistemology field. However, it`s worth noting that not